iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Regulations Compliance ›› Product Standards ›› AliExpress Fined Record €550m by EU for Allowing Sale of Illegal Products Under Digital Services Act

AliExpress Fined Record €550m by EU for Allowing Sale of Illegal Products Under Digital Services Act

The European Commission fined AliExpress a record €550m (£467m) for allowing the sale of illegal products such as unsafe toys and counterfeit clothes, the highest penalty under the Digital Services Act. The two-year investigation found detection systems failed, illegal products remained online for weeks, and compliance checks were easily circumvented. AliExpress must pay the fine and submit a remediation plan by October 20.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 20, 2026
AliExpress Fined Record €550m by EU for Allowing Sale of Illegal Products Under Digital Services Act

The European Commission has imposed a record €550m (£467m) fine on Chinese e-commerce giant AliExpress for failing to prevent the sale of illegal products on its platform, according to BBC News. The penalty is the highest ever under the Digital Services Act (DSA), which requires large online platforms to actively counter illegal and harmful content.

What Changed: The DSA Violation

The European Commission ruled that AliExpress breached its obligation under the DSA to "diligently assess" the risk of illegal, unsafe, or fake goods on its marketplace. A two-year investigation uncovered systemic failures:

  • Detection systems "did not work properly": Many illegal products were not flagged at all.
  • Delayed removal: Even when illegal items were identified, they remained on the site for several weeks.
  • Weak enforcement: AliExpress did not properly enforce penalties against traders selling illegal goods.
  • Circumventable checks: Product compliance checks could be "easily circumvented".

Who Is Affected

AliExpress, owned by Chinese tech conglomerate Alibaba, serves 193 million users in Europe — more than fellow Chinese retailers Shein and Temu. The fine directly impacts Alibaba, which reported a global turnover of €122bn last year. The DSA applies to all very large online platforms (VLOPs) with over 45 million monthly active users in the EU.

Platform Fine (€) Status
AliExpress 550 million Record fine, must submit plan by 20 October
Temu 200 million Earlier fine for similar violations
X (formerly Twitter) 120 million Fined for deceptive blue tick badge practices
Shein Under investigation Not yet fined

Compliance Obligations and Deadlines

Under the DSA, companies must:

  1. Implement effective detection and removal systems for illegal or harmful content.
  2. Enforce penalties on non-compliant traders.
  3. Ensure product compliance checks are robust and not easily circumvented.
  4. Cooperate with regulators during investigations.

AliExpress is now required to pay the €550m fine and present a detailed plan to the European Commission by 20 October outlining actions to address the breaches.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The DSA permits fines of up to 6% of a company's global annual turnover. While Alibaba's €122bn revenue would theoretically allow a fine of up to €7.3bn, the Commission imposed €550m, noting that the penalty reflects the gravity of the violations but remains proportionate.

"Scale is not an excuse for selling dangerous or illegal goods. The spread of counterfeit clothing, unsafe toys, dangerous cosmetics and other illegal and harmful products is not an unavoidable cost of shopping online — it is a failure by AliExpress to comply with its obligations." — Henna Virkkunen, European Commission Executive Vice President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy

Industry Impact and Guidance

This is the third fine under the DSA, following penalties on Temu (€200m) and X (€120m). Shein remains under investigation. The enforcement signals the EU's intent to hold large platforms accountable for product safety and counterfeit goods. Trade compliance officers should monitor DSA obligations for their own platforms, particularly regarding detection systems and trader vetting. The European Commission has not yet issued specific guidance for this case, but the AliExchange decision underscores the need for robust compliance frameworks.

AliExpress stated: "We disagree with today's decision and the disproportionate fine, which does not adequately reflect our established framework and the significant, proactive enhancements we have made. We are carefully reviewing the decision and considering all available options."


Sources: BBC-Business

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

EU Fines Google $1 Billion for Prioritizing Its Own Services in Search Rankings Technology

EU Fines Google $1 Billion for Prioritizing Its Own Services in Search Rankings

The European Commission has fined Google $1 billion for violating the Digital Markets Act by giving preferential treatment to its own services in search results and restricting app developers from communicating with users outside the Play Store. Google stated it will consider appealing, while industry groups argue that heavy-handed enforcement harms European consumers. The fine adds to a series of multi-billion-dollar EU antitrust penalties against Google.

July 23, 2026
Ticket Reseller StubHub Fined £900,000 by UK CMA for Hidden Fees; Customers to Receive Refunds E-Commerce & Marketplaces

Ticket Reseller StubHub Fined £900,000 by UK CMA for Hidden Fees; Customers to Receive Refunds

The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) fined ticket reseller StubHub £900,000 for failing to display total prices upfront, including hidden fees. More than 50,000 customers are expected to receive refunds averaging £10 per transaction. The CMA warned that hidden fees are illegal and unfair to consumers.

June 23, 2026
Coupang Fined $400M by South Korea for Massive Data Breach Affecting 37.5 Million Users Technology

Coupang Fined $400M by South Korea for Massive Data Breach Affecting 37.5 Million Users

South Korea's data protection regulator fined Coupang $400M (624.68bn won) for a data breach affecting 37.5 million users, the largest such fine ever. The leak exposed names, contact, delivery details, and order histories. Coupang expressed regret and plans to challenge the decision; its CEO resigned.

June 14, 2026
What’s wrong with FuelEU: Six flaws in the EU maritime fuel rule Regulations & Compliance

What’s wrong with FuelEU: Six flaws in the EU maritime fuel rule

FuelEU Maritime, Regulation (EU) 2023/1805, requires annual cuts in the greenhouse gas intensity of ship fuels. A Splash247 analysis by Captain Alex Byelyavtsev identifies six structural problems: collective compliance, unready fuel supply, the burden on fuel users, a steep target trajectory, capital constraints, and the placement of duty on vessels rather than system improvements. Shipping faces the rule alongside the EU ETS.

August 10, 2026