iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Regulations Compliance ›› Product Standards ›› FSSAI Issues Notices to Heritage, La Casa, Cipzer Over Misleading Food Claims

FSSAI Issues Notices to Heritage, La Casa, Cipzer Over Misleading Food Claims

India's food regulator, FSSAI, has issued notices to several food business operators for misleading claims and labelling violations. Brands targeted include 'Heritage Fresh Paneer', 'La Casa vegan hazelnut chocolate spread', and 'Cipzer Nutraceuticals juice capsules'. The regulator also previously warned energy drink makers about unauthorised functional claims.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 6, 2026
FSSAI Issues Notices to Heritage, La Casa, Cipzer Over Misleading Food Claims

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) on Monday issued a notice to brand 'Heritage Fresh Paneer' over its use of the claim 'Fresh Paneer' on product packaging, stating that the label could mislead consumers, according to a post on X by the regulator. The action is part of a broader enforcement drive against misleading claims and labelling violations under the FSS Act, 2006.

Regulatory Action and Affected Products

FSSAI reported that it had found the claim 'Fresh Paneer' on Heritage's product to be misleading and directed food business operators (FBOs) to comply with labelling regulations. The regulator wrote on X: 'The misleading claim 'Fresh Paneer' was observed on the product 'Heritage Fresh Paneer'.' In the same statement, FSSAI added that it had issued notices to several FBOs for violations related to misleading claims and labelling. 'FSSAI has issued notices to several food business operators (FBOs) for violating provisions of the FSS Act, 2006 regarding misleading claims and labelling violations. FBOs are directed to strictly comply with the established regulations and to take corrective measures,' it said.

Other products targeted in the same enforcement wave include:

  • 'La Casa vegan hazelnut chocolate spread' over its claims of being 'vegan', '100% organic', and 'all natural'.
  • 'Cipzer Nutraceuticals juice capsules' over misleading claims stating it is 'FSSAI approved' and 'made with organic vegetables'.

The regulator also previously issued notices to several beverage companies for marketing their products as 'energy drinks', noting that no standard for 'energy drinks' has been notified under the Food Safety and Standards Regulations. The energy drink brands cited include Hell Energy Drink, Adrenaline Rush Energy Drink, Red Bull Energy Drink, and Sting Energy Drink.

Legal Basis and Compliance Obligations

All enforcement measures are grounded in the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and related rules and regulations. FSSAI clarified that food companies cannot make functional or therapeutic claims — such as boosting energy, enhancing focus, or helping with general weakness — unless such claims are specifically permitted under the Act and the relevant regulations.

FSSAI stated that the recent measures are aimed at ensuring food products do not carry claims or labels that could mislead consumers or imply regulatory approval where none exists.

Summary of Notices Issued

Brand / Product Claim(s) Challenged Grounds
Heritage Fresh Paneer 'Fresh Paneer' Misleading label
La Casa vegan hazelnut chocolate spread 'vegan', '100% organic', 'all natural' Misleading claims
Cipzer Nutraceuticals juice capsules 'FSSAI approved', 'made with organic vegetables' Misleading claims
Hell Energy Drink, Adrenaline Rush, Red Bull, Sting 'energy drink' marketing No standard notified for 'energy drinks'; functional claims not permitted

Implications for Industry and Compliance Teams

For trade compliance officers and food business operators, the FSSAI actions underscore the need for strict adherence to labelling regulations. Any claim on packaging — whether related to freshness, organic content, vegan status, or health benefits — must be verifiably accurate and specifically permitted under the FSS Act and subsidiary regulations. The regulator's emphasis on not implying regulatory approval ('FSSAI approved') without explicit authorisation is particularly relevant. Companies should conduct internal audits of product labels and claims to avoid enforcement actions, which can include notices, corrective measures, and potential penalties under the Act.


Sources: Business-Today

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

FSSAI Bars Dabur From Selling Products With '100%' Claims, Cites Misleading Labels Regulations & Compliance

FSSAI Bars Dabur From Selling Products With '100%' Claims, Cites Misleading Labels

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has prohibited Dabur India Limited from selling food products carrying '100 per cent' claims, saying the labels are ambiguous, unverifiable and likely to mislead consumers. The order covers honey, cow ghee, edible oils, apple cider vinegar and other items, and Dabur must submit an Action Taken Report within 15 days.

August 4, 2026
Heritage Foods Responds to FSSAI Notice Over 'Fresh Paneer' Labelling Claim Regulations & Compliance

Heritage Foods Responds to FSSAI Notice Over 'Fresh Paneer' Labelling Claim

Heritage Foods Ltd has responded to a notice from India's FSSAI challenging the 'Fresh Paneer' claim on its product. The company explained that the term refers to the product's fresh, refrigerated and preservative-free nature. It affirmed that all mandatory label declarations are present.

July 8, 2026
FSSAI Tightens Rules for Alcohol Labels, Targets Flavoured Rum and Whisky Products Regulations & Compliance

FSSAI Tightens Rules for Alcohol Labels, Targets Flavoured Rum and Whisky Products

FSSAI has initiated enforcement action against makers of Old Monk, McDowell's, Bagpiper, Antiquity Blue and Royal Challenge for allegedly adding external rum and whisky flavours and making misleading age claims. The regulator said products made primarily from neutral alcohol and external flavour should be labelled as 'Rum-flavoured Spirit' or 'Whisky-flavoured Spirit'.

August 3, 2026
United Spirits contests FSSAI flavouring order, petitions Bombay High Court Regulations & Compliance

United Spirits contests FSSAI flavouring order, petitions Bombay High Court

Diageo-owned United Spirits has moved the Bombay High Court against an FSSAI order concerning McDowell's No. 1 Rum manufactured at its Baramati plant. FSSAI barred the sale of certain rum and whisky products, saying flavouring agents cannot replicate the taste of regular spirits. United Spirits says its product labels comply with Indian regulations and long-standing industry practice.

August 5, 2026