iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Logistics ›› Shipping Freight ›› Shipping Lines ›› Modal Shift: Why Shippers Avoid Cheaper Intermodal Despite Cost Savings

Modal Shift: Why Shippers Avoid Cheaper Intermodal Despite Cost Savings

Nicholas Shipe from Circle Logistics explains that in automotive logistics, shippers avoid cheaper intermodal rail because production uptime is the priority. Cost is not the only driver; manufacturers also consider America's overlooked energy advantage shaping industrial supply chains.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 24, 2026
Modal Shift: Why Shippers Avoid Cheaper Intermodal Despite Cost Savings

Shippers are bypassing cheaper intermodal rail options in favor of expedited trucking, driven by a need to protect production uptime in automotive supply chains, according to FreightWaves.

The Automotive Logistics Factor

Nicholas Shipe from Circle Logistics revealed critical shifts in automotive logistics and the factors influencing intermodal versus expedited freight decisions, FreightWaves reported. The analysis highlights that while intermodal rail offers cost advantages, shippers in the automotive sector are reluctant to switch modes.

Production Uptime Over Cost

According to FreightWaves, cost is not the only driver when manufacturers prioritize production uptime. The risk of delays or disruptions from intermodal rail—such as missed connections or longer transit times—can halt assembly lines, leading to losses that outweigh the savings from cheaper transportation. As a result, expedited trucking remains preferred despite higher rates.

America's Overlooked Energy Advantage

The article also notes a surprising truth about America's overlooked energy advantage that is shaping industrial supply chains. FreightWaves reported that this factor influences decisions on where to locate production and how to route freight, potentially favoring domestic trucking over rail intermodal in certain corridors.

Implications for Shippers and Operators

For logistics managers and freight forwarders, the modal shift dynamics observed in automotive logistics serve as a cautionary tale. While intermodal can reduce costs, the trade-off with reliability must be weighed carefully. Shippers should evaluate their own supply chains for criticality of uptime versus cost savings. Additionally, the energy advantage could alter lane economics over time, making domestic trucking even more competitive.

FreightWaves' coverage underscores that modal shift decisions are never purely based on rate benchmarks. Carriers and 3PLs must understand the operational context of each shipper, especially in time-sensitive industries like automotive. The brokerage community, including firms like Circle Logistics, plays a key role in navigating these complexities.

In practice, shippers may still use intermodal for less time-sensitive freight, but for high-value, just-in-time shipments, expedited trucking remains the default. The energy advantage may also shift capacity from rail to truck if fuel costs remain favorable for over-the-road operations.


Sources: FreightWaves

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

BNSF expands intermodal rail service between Phoenix and North Texas for shippers Logistics

BNSF expands intermodal rail service between Phoenix and North Texas for shippers

BNSF Railway has expanded intermodal rail service between the Phoenix metro area and North Texas, now running six days a week with transit of just over three days. The move is aimed at converting truck freight to rail ahead of the domestic peak shipping season. BNSF is also building Logistics Park Phoenix, with its first phase slated to open in early 2027, according to FreightWaves.

August 18, 2026
Intermodal Demand Surges, but Drayage Capacity Squeeze Caps STG Logistics' Growth Logistics

Intermodal Demand Surges, but Drayage Capacity Squeeze Caps STG Logistics' Growth

STG Logistics CEO Geoff Anderman told FreightWaves that drayage capacity constraints forced the company to leave intermodal volume on the table in Q2, with the squeeze persisting into summer. The company exited Chapter 11 in July with 90% less debt and new owners Fortress, Fidelity and Invesco. Anderman identified over-the-road trucking, not rival intermodal providers, as the main competition.

August 6, 2026
Intermodal Rail Volume Surges 7.2% as Carload Freight Slips in Weekly AAR Data Logistics

Intermodal Rail Volume Surges 7.2% as Carload Freight Slips in Weekly AAR Data

The Association of American Railroads reported intermodal traffic jumped 7.2% year-on-year in the week ending July 18, while carloads declined 1.2%. Total combined volume rose 3.4%. Year-to-date intermodal units are up 3.8%, and carloads up 2.9%. Coal and motor vehicles led carload declines. The data, covering U.S. railroads and North American networks, shows intermodal continuing to outpace traditional rail freight.

July 22, 2026
Intermodal rail volumes surge as shippers shift from trucks amid rising rates Logistics

Intermodal rail volumes surge as shippers shift from trucks amid rising rates

U.S. intermodal rail volume rose 10.9% year-over-year for the week ending June 13, according to the Association of American Railroads, as shippers increasingly switch from trucks to rail amid strengthening truck rates and an early peak season. Total combined carload and intermodal traffic increased 5.6% on North American railroads, with Canadian and Mexican railroads also posting gains in intermodal.

June 24, 2026