BenQ's TK705STi short-throw 4K projector, priced in the midrange between sub-$1,000 entry-level models and $6,000-plus high-end units, aims to attract gamers with its low-latency performance and flexible screen sizing, according to a WIRED review by John Brandon.
Gaming Performance and Short-Throw Design
The primary selling point of the TK705STi is its low-latency performance, which the reviewer found impressive when playing 007 First Light on Xbox at a screen size of 12.5 feet. The projector's short-throw design, with a throw ratio of 0.8:1, allows placement close to the wall: to achieve a 10-foot-wide image, the projector is placed 8 feet away; for a 12-foot-wide image, it is placed 10 feet away. This flexibility makes it suitable for various room setups, including a brightly lit family room with large windows.
Picture Quality and Drawbacks
For home cinema use, the TK705STi's picture quality for movies and TV shows was not impressive, especially compared to the Leica Cine Play 1, which costs approximately twice the price. The review noted that the overall performance was just average, and the projector is not recommended for those seeking high-end picture quality.
A notable issue was the auto-keystoning feature, which the reviewer found finicky: it often mapped incorrectly to the wall or screen. Manually adjusting the screen resolved the problem but added inconvenience. Additionally, the projector's legs were described as "shaky," lacking stability; bumping the table could cause jostling and trigger auto-keystoning again. BenQ representatives told the reviewer that the leg issue was not normal and could be related to the specific projector screen used.
Verdict and Target Audience
The WIRED review concludes that the TK705STi is a solid choice for gamers who prioritize low-latency and large screen size over absolute picture fidelity. For non-gamers or home cinema enthusiasts, the midrange projector's average performance and software glitches may be disappointing, making the Leica Cine Play 1 or other high-end models a better investment despite the higher cost.
Sources:
