iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Relay Q: London Startup's AI Microphone Puts Hands-Free Voice Dictation on the Desktop Google Pixel 10a Crowned Best Budget Pixel in WIRED's Updated 2026 Buying Guide Global Steel Wire seeks fresh Santander terminal concession Veritas Shipmanagement books fresh ultramax pair at COSCO yard, Splash247 reports Seanergy linked to fresh newcastlemax at Hengli as dry bulk orderbook grows Weaker rupee may push foreign assets over FAST-DS Rs 1 crore limit, raising tax bill 45 Indian power plants face critically low coal stocks as monsoon hits supply SFL Makes Fresh $363m Car Carrier Play With Four LNG Dual-Fuel Newbuilds Iran Blacklist Threatens Hormuz Shuttle Tanker Lifeline for Gulf Crude Keyfield International Enters Dredging Market with $24.7m Vessel Acquisition Relay Q: London Startup's AI Microphone Puts Hands-Free Voice Dictation on the Desktop Google Pixel 10a Crowned Best Budget Pixel in WIRED's Updated 2026 Buying Guide Global Steel Wire seeks fresh Santander terminal concession Veritas Shipmanagement books fresh ultramax pair at COSCO yard, Splash247 reports Seanergy linked to fresh newcastlemax at Hengli as dry bulk orderbook grows Weaker rupee may push foreign assets over FAST-DS Rs 1 crore limit, raising tax bill 45 Indian power plants face critically low coal stocks as monsoon hits supply SFL Makes Fresh $363m Car Carrier Play With Four LNG Dual-Fuel Newbuilds Iran Blacklist Threatens Hormuz Shuttle Tanker Lifeline for Gulf Crude Keyfield International Enters Dredging Market with $24.7m Vessel Acquisition
Home ›› Business ›› Markets ›› Indian ›› US Judge Orders Justice Department to Justify Dropping Adani Fraud Charges, Denies Quick Dismissal

US Judge Orders Justice Department to Justify Dropping Adani Fraud Charges, Denies Quick Dismissal

A US judge has ordered the Justice Department to provide a detailed justification for dropping criminal charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, declining to immediately dismiss the case. Judge Nicholas Garaufis called the government's brief statement 'terse, bland and conclusory' and set a July 13 deadline for further submissions. The charges, filed in 2024, alleged securities fraud and bribery related to a solar energy project in India.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 8, 2026
US Judge Orders Justice Department to Justify Dropping Adani Fraud Charges, Denies Quick Dismissal

A federal judge in Brooklyn has ordered the US Justice Department to explain its decision to drop criminal charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, declining to grant a quick dismissal of the case, according to a court filing reported by Business Today.

Judge's Ruling and Deadline

US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis ruled on Friday that the government's May 18 announcement that it would no longer pursue the case did not provide a sufficient basis for dismissal. In his written order, Garaufis described the prosecutors' statement as "terse, bland and conclusory," affording the court "neither a sufficient basis to reach any conclusion, nor the opportunity to conduct any analysis of the Government's request for dismissal." He gave the Justice Department until July 13 to submit additional information justifying the move.

Background of the Charges

The charges against Adani were brought in 2024 during the final months of then-President Joe Biden's term. The indictment alleged that Adani agreed to bribe Indian government officials to secure approval for a solar energy plant being developed by a subsidiary of his Adani Group. Adani was also accused of misleading US investors about the company's anti-corruption practices, constituting securities fraud and wire fraud. The decision to drop the charges represents the latest instance of the Justice Department seeking to end a high-profile white-collar criminal prosecution under President Donald Trump's second term.

Legal Context

Legal experts cited in the report note that federal judges have limited discretion to compel prosecutors to continue pursuing cases they no longer wish to prosecute. However, the charges against Adani remain officially pending until Judge Garaufis orders them dismissed. A spokesperson for the Brooklyn U.S. Attorney's office, which brought the original charges, declined to comment.

Defense Arguments

Robert Giuffra, Adani's lawyer, argued in a letter to Garaufis on June 24 that the case should be dismissed because it was beyond the reach of US law and prosecutors would be unable to prove the alleged bribery in India. Giuffra stated that Adani's legal team held several meetings with Justice Department officials and submitted nearly 500 pages of materials to demonstrate the case's weaknesses. "The DOJ’s decision reflects its careful consideration of the indictment’s legal and factual weaknesses," Giuffra wrote. The government's dismissal request, signed by senior officials but not by the career prosecutors who brought the case, said the department had "decided, in its prosecutorial discretion, not to devote further resources to these criminal charges against individual defendants."

Related Settlements

Separately, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought civil charges against Adani. A settlement was reached under which Gautam Adani would pay $6 million and his nephew, Sagar Adani, would pay $12 million. Additionally, Adani Enterprises Limited agreed to pay $275 million to the US Treasury Department to settle alleged violations of Iran sanctions. The Adani Group has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

Broader Pattern

The case mirrors another instance where the Justice Department under Trump dropped corruption charges against a high-profile figure. In 2025, senior DOJ officials in Washington overruled career prosecutors to drop charges against then-New York Mayor Eric Adams, leading to resignations among the prosecution team.

Key Date Event
2024 Indictment of Gautam Adani for securities fraud and bribery scheme
May 18, 2026 DOJ announces decision to drop criminal charges
June 24, 2026 Adani's lawyer files letter arguing for dismissal
June 27, 2026 Judge Garaufis orders DOJ to justify decision, sets July 13 deadline

Next Milestone

The next key date is July 13, 2026, when the Justice Department must submit a detailed explanation to the court. Until then, the charges remain pending, and Adani has not appeared in US court to respond to the allegations.


Sources: Business-Today

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

US Judge Permanently Dismisses Securities Fraud Case Against Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani Business

US Judge Permanently Dismisses Securities Fraud Case Against Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani

A US federal judge permanently dismissed securities fraud counts against Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani, nephew Sagar Adani and former Adani Green CEO Vneet Jaain, approving the Justice Department's Rule 48(a) motion. The court deferred two counts — Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and obstruction — pending further government requirements. Gautam Adani said 'Truth has prevailed.'

August 11, 2026
Bombay High Court Quashes Government's Retrospective Spectrum Charge, Providing Relief to Telecom Companies Business

Bombay High Court Quashes Government's Retrospective Spectrum Charge, Providing Relief to Telecom Companies

The Bombay High Court on Monday quashed the government's one-time spectrum charge imposed retrospectively from 2008, providing major relief to Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea. The court held that the government cannot unilaterally alter financial terms of telecom licences after they have been granted. The retrospective demands cumulatively exceeded Rs 6,000 crore for the two companies.

June 15, 2026
Delhi HC Clears Samir Modi in Defamation Case Over Board Remarks Business

Delhi HC Clears Samir Modi in Defamation Case Over Board Remarks

The Delhi High Court has cleared Samir Modi of defamation charges related to remarks made during a 2024 board meeting. The court found no defamatory intent towards directors Nirmala Bagri and Atul Kumar Gupta.

June 8, 2026
Texas appeals court hands shipper liability another setback as C.H. Robinson plays offense Logistics

Texas appeals court hands shipper liability another setback as C.H. Robinson plays offense

A Texas appeals court rejected vicarious liability claims against shipper Atlas Aerospace, marking the second such setback for plaintiffs in Texas courts. Meanwhile, C.H. Robinson published a Q&A defending against the $604 million Lipe vs. Lupus Superior verdict and reaffirmed its plan to appeal. The rulings sharpen the legal test for who bears liability beyond the carrier and broker in freight accidents.

August 5, 2026