The recent collision of the vessel Dali with a bridge is the latest symptom of a systemic shift in third-party shipmanagement, according to an analysis by industry veteran Sunil Kapoor in Splash247. Kapoor, with over 30 years in the sector, argues that the focus has moved from technical expertise to fleet expansion, eroding layers of safety protection.
The Erosion of Technical Ownership
Kapoor recalls the early days when shipmanagement was about genuine technical knowledge, citing Univan as a pioneer. Today, management companies prioritise profitability and scale, and "technical excellence does not fit neatly into a dashboard," he writes. The measure of credibility became fleet size rather than vessel condition.
The foundation of third-party shipmanagement was built on real technical expertise. Owners entrusted vessels to professional managers because those organisations possessed knowledge owners could not replicate. Kapoor writes that superintendents of that era were problem-solvers who had lived through blackouts, machinery failures, and emergency repairs firsthand. They knew their ships "the way a doctor knows a long-term patient — not from a dashboard, but from accumulated, intimate familiarity."
But somewhere along the way the focus shifted. Attracting owners became the primary goal. Fleet size became the measure of credibility. Sales pitches, which once featured photographs of ships — evidence of condition — are now led by software dashboards and remote monitoring platforms. The discussion is about reporting systems rather than the actual vessel condition.
The Superintendent's Diminished Role
Kapoor paints a stark picture of the modern superintendent: "Today’s superintendent is a node in an information chain." A problem surfaces on the vessel; he logs it, reports it, escalates it, and waits. His real function is to keep information moving upward and keep the ship trading until the situation becomes impossible to defer. In large management companies, the gap between a superintendent and a director has widened. Inexperienced superintendents, often without a senior mentor, learn that escalating a problem creates friction. Recommending that a ship goes off hire for repairs becomes a career risk, so they learn the safer instinct: manage workarounds.
Kapoor illustrates this with a chief engineer's remark: "Sir, this alarm comes and goes. We know how to manage it." That sentence, he writes, explains more than most investigation reports.
| Aspect | Past (1990s) | Present |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Technical expertise | Fleet growth & financial performance |
| Sales pitch | Photographs of ships | Software dashboards |
| Superintendent role | Problem-solver | Information node |
| Risk tolerance | Skilled repairs | Deferred maintenance |
Historical Parallel: Cosco Busan
Kapoor draws a parallel to the Cosco Busan allision with the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge in 2007. Different ship, different circumstances, different immediate causes, yet both exposed the same weaknesses in the layers of protection that were supposed to prevent such accidents. "History does not repeat itself exactly. But it repeats its lessons. The tragedy is that shipping rarely seems to learn them."
Implications for Global Trade
While the article does not provide specific trade volumes, the operational trends directly affect supply chain reliability. Delays in repairs, deferred maintenance, and increased risk of casualties can disrupt cargo flows for importers and exporters. The shift from hands-on management to dashboard-driven oversight highlights vulnerabilities that freight forwarders, customs brokers, and import/export managers should monitor. Shipmanagement companies, originally established across Hong Kong, Singapore, India, Dubai, Cyprus, and elsewhere, now compete on scale. The financial pressure to expand fleets and improve margins — often justified with the phrase "We are not a charitable organisation" — may be compromising the technical excellence that once defined the industry.
Kapoor writes that the managers of the 1990s arrived with a familiar message: "We are different. We will do things better." Today, that differentiation has given way to uniformity of scale. The Dali casualty is not an isolated event; it is a warning from a system that has been developing cracks for decades. For trade professionals, the lesson is clear: the safety and reliability of container shipping depend on more than just data dashboards. They depend on ships that are technically well-managed, not just financially optimised.
What to watch: The next major maritime casualty investigation report will likely echo the same systemic findings, unless the industry returns to valuing technical ownership as the core of shipmanagement.
Sources:
