iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Technology ›› Ai ›› Ai Regulation ›› San Francisco Demands Apple and Google Remove AI ‘Nudify’ Apps from App Stores

San Francisco Demands Apple and Google Remove AI ‘Nudify’ Apps from App Stores

San Francisco city attorney David Chiu sent cease-and-desist letters to Apple and Google demanding removal of 13 AI-powered “nudify” apps that generate nonconsensual intimate images. The letters allege the tech giants have profited millions from the apps and are aiding illegal deepfake pornography. Google has removed hundreds of similar apps; Apple did not comment.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 17, 2026
San Francisco Demands Apple and Google Remove AI ‘Nudify’ Apps from App Stores

San Francisco city attorney David Chiu sent cease-and-desist letters to Apple and Google on Thursday, demanding the companies remove 13 apps from their app stores that allow users to create AI-generated nonconsensual nude images, according to letters seen by WIRED.

Legal Action Against Deepfake Nudification Apps

The letters accuse Apple and Google of “aiding and abetting” the sale of explicit deepfake images and call on the Silicon Valley giants to “sever” business relationships with the app developers. Chiu told WIRED that the companies have likely “made millions of dollars in fees” from apps that offer “nudification.” The legal notices cite California laws prohibiting supporting services that create deepfake pornography.

“Generating non-consensual intimate images is illegal, harmful, and completely unacceptable,” Chiu said. “These companies have responsibility to ensure that apps on their platforms do not facilitate sexual abuse.”

The city attorney’s office previously took legal action against 16 popular deepfake websites, and the latest letters target eight apps on Apple’s App Store and five on Google Play.

Industry Response

Google spokesperson Dan Jackson told WIRED that the company has deleted “hundreds” of apps with nudifying features for policy violations, including the five Android apps flagged by Chiu’s office. “Google Play does not allow apps that contain sexual content, and we continually take proactive steps to detect and remove apps with harmful content,” Jackson said in a statement. He added that the company has also restricted search terms like “nudify” on its store.

Apple did not provide comment ahead of publication. Both companies have developer policies that prohibit pornography, abuse, and harassment, and have previously removed dozens of such apps after reports by researchers and journalists.

Entity Action Taken
Apple No comment; 8 apps flagged by Chiu
Google Removed “hundreds” of apps; restricted search terms; 5 Android apps flagged

The Rise of Deepfake Nudification Technology

Over the last five years, a lucrative ecosystem of deepfake “nudification” tech has emerged online, most prominently with xAI’s Grok being used to create millions of sexualized images in January. A host of apps, websites, and bots allow people—overwhelmingly men—to upload pictures of women and girls and digitally “remove” clothing or place them into graphic sexual scenarios. Some results are available in seconds, and the technology has become more realistic as generative AI improves.

Previous reporting by WIRED and Indicator Media uncovered incidents in at least 90 schools where deepfake sexual abuse images were created of minors. Chiu emphasized the human toll: “These images are used to bully, humiliate, and threaten women and girls… There have been victims who’ve been suicidal.”

Implications for Enterprise Technology Leaders

The San Francisco action highlights growing regulatory scrutiny of platform liability for third-party AI applications. For enterprise technology leaders responsible for supply chains, logistics platforms, or digital trade systems, the case underscores the need for rigorous content moderation and compliance checks when integrating or hosting AI tools. Regulators are increasingly holding platform operators accountable for facilitating harmful uses of AI, even when the technology is provided by external developers. Companies must ensure their own AI deployments and marketplaces do not expose them to similar legal risks, particularly as laws like California’s set precedents for holding tech firms responsible for the misuse of their platforms.


Sources: WIRED – Top Stories

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

Meta Ran Ads for an App That Promised to Nudify Female Politicians Technology

Meta Ran Ads for an App That Promised to Nudify Female Politicians

Meta's ad systems ran promotions for Kromix, an AI tool that produces nonconsensual pornographic videos resembling female US politicians, according to WIRED. The ads were removed only after WIRED asked about them, underscoring gaps in automated ad review and App Store enforcement.

August 18, 2026
Instagram, Facebook Ran AI ‘Nudify’ Ads from China, Report Says Technology

Instagram, Facebook Ran AI ‘Nudify’ Ads from China, Report Says

According to the Tech Transparency Project, Meta’s Facebook and Instagram ran thousands of ads for AI “nudify” apps that can create non-consensual intimate images, delivered by Beijing-based advertising partner GatherOne. The ads violated Meta’s own policies against sexually suggestive content. Meta says it prohibits such apps and takes action, but the report suggests revenue priorities may be overriding enforcement.

July 27, 2026
Can AI Coexist With Privacy? Proton CEO Andy Yen Says It Will Have To Technology

Can AI Coexist With Privacy? Proton CEO Andy Yen Says It Will Have To

Proton founder and CEO Andy Yen tells WIRED that AI and privacy must coexist, even as the encrypted-services company launches its own Lumo chatbot. He argues corporate surveillance, not government spying, is the bigger threat to user data, and says privacy-preserving AI can be built by design. WIRED's interview covers Proton's CERN origins, its encrypted alternatives to Google services, and the influx of new users driven by tech giants' default AI push.

August 18, 2026
Sainsbury's pauses London store's AI cameras after shopper wrongly accused of shoplifting Technology

Sainsbury's pauses London store's AI cameras after shopper wrongly accused of shoplifting

Sainsbury's has paused live facial recognition cameras at a London store after a shopper was wrongly flagged as a shoplifter by Facewatch technology. The incident, along with a 0.2% error rate, raises questions about AI surveillance deployment in retail.

August 17, 2026