iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Technology ›› Ai ›› Computer Vision ›› EU Parliament Votes to Extend Big Tech's Right to Scan Private Messages Despite Majority Opposition

EU Parliament Votes to Extend Big Tech's Right to Scan Private Messages Despite Majority Opposition

The European Parliament has voted to extend legislation allowing tech companies like Meta, Google, and Microsoft to voluntarily scan users' private messages for child sexual abuse material, despite a majority of lawmakers voting against the proposal. The ruling reinstates permissions for scanning private text, email, and social media messages, but end-to-end encrypted chats remain exempt.

iG
iGEN Editorial
July 9, 2026
EU Parliament Votes to Extend Big Tech's Right to Scan Private Messages Despite Majority Opposition

The European Parliament has voted to extend legislation allowing tech companies to voluntarily scan users' private messages for child sexual abuse material, a move critics say undermines digital privacy and sets a dangerous precedent for surveillance. Despite a majority of lawmakers voting against the proposal — a rare procedural outcome — the measure passed due to a quirk in parliamentary rules, according to WIRED.

The Vote and Procedural Maneuver

The legislation, nicknamed "Chat Control" by critics, reinstates permissions for firms including Meta, Google, and Microsoft to scan private text, email, and social media messages for child sexual abuse material. End-to-end encrypted chats, such as those on WhatsApp and Signal, remain exempt, per the ruling. The vote took place on Thursday, with more Members of the European Parliament voting against the regulation than for it. However, they fell short of the required absolute majority of 361 votes by 47 votes, meaning the proposal passed. The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, had been pushing to bring back tech firms' legal basis to scan messages since a prior law expired in April. The EPP resorted to an "urgent procedure" — skipping preliminary committee debates where amendments would often be introduced — to force fresh votes after talks collapsed in March. The procedure stipulates that the regulation passes unless an absolute majority of 361 MEPs vote against it.

Reactions from Rights Advocates and Politicians

Simeon de Brouwer, policy advisor at Brussels-based advocacy group European Digital Rights, told WIRED: "It will mean that private companies may deny your right to have confidential digital conversations… they could, if they want to, read every message you write, every email you send, every picture you share." The EPP vice-chair Tomas Tobé defended the move, telling lawmakers earlier in the week: "We cannot go to the summer recess knowing that our children are not protected." Civil rights activist and former MEP Patrick Breyer called the ruling a "farce" that "damages democracy." In a blog post, Breyer wrote: "Our children are the real losers in this undemocratic process. Trying to protect children with suspicionless mass surveillance is like frantically mopping the floor while the faucet is still running. Blanket chat control is just as unacceptable as indiscriminately opening everyone's physical mail."

Implications for Digital Rights and Enterprise Security

The extension means tech companies will retain the right to scan messages for child sexual abuse detection until 2028, or until permanent legislation — already dubbed "Chat Control" by critics — replaces it. For enterprise technology decision-makers, the ruling highlights the ongoing tension between security and privacy in digital communications. While the exemption for end-to-end encrypted platforms like WhatsApp and Signal offers a measure of protection for business communications, the broader permission for scanning non-encrypted messages could affect corporate data privacy policies. Companies relying on cloud-based messaging and email services from Meta, Google, and Microsoft may need to reassess the confidentiality of their internal communications, as these platforms could technically scan messages without user consent. The decision also underscores the need for organizations to adopt end-to-end encryption solutions for sensitive business correspondence to avoid potential surveillance, even under the guise of child protection.

The procedural maneuver used to pass the legislation — bypassing committee debates — has drawn criticism from democracy advocates. The European Parliament is set to disperse for its summer break at the end of the month, which added urgency to the EPP's push. The ultimate fate of permanent legislation remains uncertain, but the current extension provides a multi-year window for tech companies to continue scanning, raising ongoing privacy concerns for both individuals and enterprises.


Sources: WIRED – Security

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

Can AI Coexist With Privacy? Proton CEO Andy Yen Says It Will Have To Technology

Can AI Coexist With Privacy? Proton CEO Andy Yen Says It Will Have To

Proton founder and CEO Andy Yen tells WIRED that AI and privacy must coexist, even as the encrypted-services company launches its own Lumo chatbot. He argues corporate surveillance, not government spying, is the bigger threat to user data, and says privacy-preserving AI can be built by design. WIRED's interview covers Proton's CERN origins, its encrypted alternatives to Google services, and the influx of new users driven by tech giants' default AI push.

August 18, 2026
DHS Demand for Protesters' Signal Group Chats Sparks First Amendment Fight Technology

DHS Demand for Protesters' Signal Group Chats Sparks First Amendment Fight

The Department of Homeland Security is seeking neighborhood 'rapid response' Signal group chats in the Hilton v. Noem lawsuit, where protesters accuse DHS of First Amendment violations. Attorneys for the protesters argue the discovery demand itself violates the First Amendment, while turning over smaller chats with redactions.

August 5, 2026
Apple challenges UK government again over encrypted data access order Technology

Apple challenges UK government again over encrypted data access order

Apple has confirmed it has launched a new legal complaint against the UK government at a court that handles objections to covert surveillance powers. The Financial Times reports the complaint is another challenge to a Home Office demand for backdoor access to encrypted Apple user data protected by Advanced Data Protection, according to BBC News. Privacy groups Privacy International and Liberty have welcomed the challenge.

August 4, 2026
Centre may expand CCTV-like import restrictions to other sensitive areas, says IT secretary Technology

Centre may expand CCTV-like import restrictions to other sensitive areas, says IT secretary

Electronics and IT Secretary S Krishnan said the government may expand the import restrictions it applied to CCTV cameras to other sensitive product categories. Speaking at a CII event on semiconductors, he said the approach, driven by security concerns about non-vetted chips, could be extended while assisting Indian chip designers in building end-to-end trusted supply chains.

July 31, 2026