iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Logistics ›› Shipping Freight ›› Shipping Lines ›› Strong finish: Ocean lines raise profit outlook by 200%

Strong finish: Ocean lines raise profit outlook by 200%

Ocean Network Express (ONE) raised its full-year profit forecast by 200% to $900 million after Q1 FY2026 revenue rose to $4.539 billion, even as net profit fell to $31 million on higher fuel costs. Average freight rates climbed to $1,300/TEU and volumes grew to 3.257 million TEUs, while bunker prices jumped to $666/ton, according to FreightWaves.

iG
iGEN Editorial
August 4, 2026
Strong finish: Ocean lines raise profit outlook by 200%

Ocean Network Express (ONE) lifted its full-year profit outlook by 200% to $900 million from a prior $300 million guidance, driven by higher freight rates and stronger volumes despite sharply higher bunker fuel costs, according to FreightWaves.

Quarterly performance: revenue up, profit down on fuel costs

For the April–June quarter (Q1 FY2026), the Singapore-based joint venture of Japan's three major container carriers reported revenue of $4.54 billion, up from $4.05 billion in the year-ago fiscal quarter. Net profit, however, tumbled to $31 million from $86 million, undercut by higher fuel costs linked to the effects of the Iran war, FreightWaves reported.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) rose to $707 million from $616 million in Q1 FY2025, with EBITDA margin improving to 15.6% from 15.2%. That trails competitor margins of 22.7% for CMA CGM of France and 16.8% for Maersk (OTC: AMKBY). Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) doubled to $76 million from $38 million; EBIT margin improved to 1.7% from 0.9%.

Metric Q1 FY2026 Q1 FY2025 Change
Revenue $4.539B $4.05B +12.1%
Net profit $31M $86M -64%
EBITDA $707M $616M +14.8%
EBITDA margin 15.6% 15.2% +0.4 pts
EBIT $76M $38M +100%
Container volumes 3.257M TEU 3.165M TEU +2.9%
Average freight rate $1,300/TEU $1,199/TEU +8.4%
Average bunker price $666/ton $535/ton +24.5%

Freight rates and volumes climb

Container volumes grew to 3.257 million TEUs from 3.165 million TEUs in Q1 FY2025. The average freight rate came in higher at $1,300 per TEU compared to $1,199 per TEU a year earlier, and up from $1,154 per TEU in Q4 FY2025, according to FreightWaves.

At the same time, average bunker fuel prices reached $666 per ton, up from $535 per ton a year ago and $440 per ton in Q4 FY2025 — a 24.5% year-over-year jump. ONE said higher bunker fuel costs weighed heavily on profitability, even as demand recovered through May–June.

Executive view and forward outlook

The ONE consortium comprises Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK), Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha ("K" Line). Chief Executive Till Ole Barrelet highlighted improved yields, strong utilization, and operational agility as central to performance, while noting continued geopolitical uncertainty, FreightWaves reported.

ONE improved yields and maintained high vessel utilization as demand recovered through May–June, despite higher fuel and operating costs from Middle East disruptions.

Shipper and forwarder implications

For freight forwarders, 3PL operators and shippers, the figures show a carrier pricing environment in which fuel inflation is being pushed into freight rates. The average freight rate rose 8.4% year-over-year while bunker costs rose 24.5% year-over-year, meaning fuel cost growth outpaced rate growth in the quarter. ONE reported that demand recovered through May–June and that vessel utilization remained high, per FreightWaves. Shippers negotiating contracts for the remainder of the fiscal year should expect the $1,300/TEU average and the $666/ton bunker cost to be reference points in carrier pricing discussions.

Watch list

  • Continued geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East and the ongoing effects of the Iran war on fuel costs, as noted by CEO Till Ole Barrelet.
  • Bunker price trajectory: average bunker price already up from $440/ton in Q4 FY2025 to $666/ton in Q1 FY2026.
  • Demand recovery momentum through May–June, which supported volumes and utilization.
  • Margin comparison: ONE's 15.6% EBITDA margin versus CMA CGM's 22.7% and Maersk's 16.8%, as reported by FreightWaves.

Sources: FreightWaves

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

Uber Freight Revenue Jumps 25% but Digital Brokerage Remains Unprofitable Logistics

Uber Freight Revenue Jumps 25% but Digital Brokerage Remains Unprofitable

Uber Freight's second-quarter revenue rose 25% year-over-year to $1.583 billion, but the digital brokerage posted a negative $24 million operating income. The company's operating margin improved slightly to negative 1.5% of gross bookings. FreightWaves reported the growth likely stems from brokerage riding higher market rates.

August 6, 2026
DHL 30% Profit Growth Led by Heavy Air Freight as Express Carriers Take More Cargo Logistics

DHL 30% Profit Growth Led by Heavy Air Freight as Express Carriers Take More Cargo

DHL Group posted a 30% increase in Q2 operating profit, driven by heavier air freight shipments, capacity shortages and fuel surcharge pass-throughs, according to FreightWaves. Express operating income jumped 64%, and DHL raised its full-year EBIT guidance to $7.43 billion.

August 5, 2026
Expeditors posts strong quarter as air freight climbs 14% and ocean flattens Logistics

Expeditors posts strong quarter as air freight climbs 14% and ocean flattens

Expeditors International posted a strong second quarter, with air freight volume up 14% year over year and ocean volumes flat but up 7% sequentially, according to FreightWaves. Revenue rose 32% to $3.5 billion, and CEO Daniel Wall cited tight air capacity, hyperscaler demand, and tariff-related customs complexity.

August 4, 2026
Are Index-Linked Freight Contracts Optimising Rates Instead of Supply Chains? Logistics

Are Index-Linked Freight Contracts Optimising Rates Instead of Supply Chains?

Dr Raymon Krishnan of Singapore's Logistics & Supply Chain Management Society argues that index-linked freight contracts, while solving pandemic-era pricing problems, are steering the industry toward optimising rates rather than supply chains. He warns that this approach rewards volatility and shifts focus away from service capabilities like schedule reliability and risk management.

August 4, 2026