iGEN
Visit IGEN World Explore IGEN Expo
EXPLORE UPGRADE PLANS
BREAKING
Home ›› Finance ›› Banking ›› RBI tightens mis-selling rules; banks barred from incentive structures that encourage aggressive sales

RBI tightens mis-selling rules; banks barred from incentive structures that encourage aggressive sales

The Reserve Bank of India on Monday tightened norms governing the advertising, marketing and sale of financial products and services to curb mis-selling. Banks and NBFCs are barred from incentive structures that encourage aggressive sales. The revised directions, effective January 1, 2027, adopt a principle-based, channel-agnostic approach and cover digital intermediaries including social media influencers.

iG
iGEN Editorial
June 15, 2026
RBI tightens mis-selling rules; banks barred from incentive structures that encourage aggressive sales

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Monday tightened norms governing the advertising, marketing and sale of financial products and services, in a move aimed at curbing mis-selling and holding regulated entities accountable across all distribution channels, including social media influencers and digital marketing intermediaries. The revised directions, which will come into force from January 1, 2027, adopt a "principle-based and channel-agnostic approach," according to a PTI report.

Key Provisions of the Revised Directions

The central bank clarified that while payment of incentives to regulated entities' (REs) employees by third parties has been prohibited, the directions do not prohibit payment of incentives by REs to their employees. The objective, the RBI stated, is to ensure incentive structures do not encourage aggressive sales practices or lead to the mis-selling of products and services.

The directions place overall responsibility on the RE for all advertising, marketing and sale of financial products undertaken directly or through agents or outsourced arrangements. The RBI said influencers, affiliates, Loan Service Providers (LSPs) and other similar digital marketing intermediaries engaged for product promotion or customer acquisition would fall within the broader category of Direct Selling Agents (DSAs) and Direct Marketing Agents (DMAs).

Stakeholder Feedback and Final Norms

The final norms follow draft directions issued in February that proposed comprehensive guidelines for the advertising, marketing and sale of financial products and services, including third-party offerings, by banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). After reviewing stakeholder feedback, the central bank issued the amended directions on Monday.

Some stakeholders had sought clarity on whether the directions would apply to social media influencers engaged by regulated entities and LSPs involved in customer acquisition activities. "The definition has been suitably modified to provide clarity in this regard," the RBI said.

Implications for Banks and NBFCs

The revised framework significantly expands the scope of covered intermediaries. Any digital marketing intermediary involved in product promotion or customer acquisition is now classified as a DSA or DMA, bringing them under the regulatory umbrella. This includes social media influencers, affiliates, and LSPs.

Provision Description
Incentives by third parties Prohibited for RE employees
Incentives by REs to employees Not prohibited
Responsibility RE responsible for all advertising, marketing, and sale activities
Coverage Includes DSAs, DMAs, affiliates, LSPs, social media influencers, and digital marketing intermediaries
Effective date January 1, 2027

"The directions adopt a principle-based and channel-agnostic approach, placing overall responsibility on the RE for all advertising, marketing and sale of financial products undertaken directly or through agents or outsourced arrangements." — RBI

The RBI clarified that the objective is to ensure incentive structures do not encourage aggressive sales practices or lead to the mis-selling of products and services. Banks and NBFCs will need to review their existing incentive frameworks, third-party agreements, and marketing channels to ensure compliance by the January 2027 deadline. The inclusion of digital marketing intermediaries under the DSA/DMA classification may require entities to register new partners and implement additional oversight mechanisms.

For finance executives and treasury professionals, the tightening of mis-selling norms represents a regulatory shift that could affect the cost and structure of distribution for financial products. While consumer lending products sold through digital channels are most directly impacted, the principle-based approach means any financial product marketed by regulated entities falls within scope. The effective date of January 1, 2027 provides a transition period for compliance, but the final norms largely reflect the draft issued in February, allowing early preparation.

The RBI's move underscores its focus on retail customer protection, and the channel-agnostic nature of the directions ensures that new digital sales channels receive the same regulatory scrutiny as traditional branches. For banks and NBFCs, this means that partnerships with fintech firms, social media influencers, and other digital acquirers must be carefully managed to avoid mis-selling risks.


Sources: Business-Today

Keep Reading

Recommended Stories

RBI Issues Stricter Norms to Curb Mis-Selling by Lenders: Consumer Protection Framework Finalized Finance

RBI Issues Stricter Norms to Curb Mis-Selling by Lenders: Consumer Protection Framework Finalized

The Reserve Bank of India has finalized its consumer protection framework under responsible business conduct guidelines, tightening rules on mis-selling, deceptive digital practices, and unauthorised bundling. The framework mandates explicit consent capture, interface defaults to 'No', and bans dark patterns, with effect from January 1, 2027.

June 16, 2026
Banks Collected Rs 7,100 Crore as Minimum Balance Penalty in FY26, Private Banks Account for 70% Finance

Banks Collected Rs 7,100 Crore as Minimum Balance Penalty in FY26, Private Banks Account for 70%

Indian banks collected nearly Rs 7,100 crore in penalties from customers for failing to maintain minimum average balance in FY26, up from Rs 6,800 crore in FY25. Private banks accounted for 70% of the charges, with HDFC Bank alone collecting Rs 1,800 crore. Meanwhile, 10 of 12 public sector banks have discontinued such penal charges, leading to a decline in their collections.

July 30, 2026
RBI: Improving Liquidity Supporting Robust Credit Growth Amid Global Uncertainties Finance

RBI: Improving Liquidity Supporting Robust Credit Growth Amid Global Uncertainties

The Reserve Bank of India's latest State of the Economy report states that improving liquidity conditions are supporting robust credit growth, even as India's external sector remains steady with an improving outlook aided by foreign investment inflows. The central bank noted that India has navigated external uncertainties well, underpinned by healthy demand and resilient industrial and services sectors. Retail inflation edged up to an 18-month high of 4.4% in June.

July 23, 2026
Not Referring Cases to Internal Ombudsman a Serious Concern: RBI Deputy Governor Finance

Not Referring Cases to Internal Ombudsman a Serious Concern: RBI Deputy Governor

RBI Deputy Governor Swaminathan J expressed serious concern that a significant number of customer grievances resolved by RBI's integrated ombudsman were never referred to the bank's internal ombudsman. Speaking at the Internal Ombudsman Conference, he said this undermines the purpose of the internal ombudsman framework and directed banks to prevent such bypassing through better complaint management systems.

July 21, 2026